So often, language can fail us. We just can’t quite find the right words or know how to express something in the correct way, or a way that truly conveys the meaning we are trying to put across. At times, never is this more true than in the therapy room, when we try and put our experiences into words, which can only ever touch the surface of those experiences. As therapists try and get an insight into the world of another, using the only tools they have available to them, which isn’t just language, but language is so much of it.
And then, within this, there is the way we refer to ourselves or our clients. And one that is becoming more pronounced is ensuring we are using the correct pronouns that our clients identify with. And, in English, it is hard when it can feel like there is so much weight in gender and he and she just aren’t enough. And I wonder whether languages that don’t distinguish gender in pronouns do any better or whether this brings its own problems. But gender is not where my thoughts are sitting today, today it is with the ideas of multiplicity.
As a general rule, I use singular pronouns for the most part. And I have had to question this, because my mind is not a singular person. But I am a singular person. And how do you split and distinguish between me and we and them, when this can all change within a matter of a sentence or two. And how much do I disclose if I do not use a singular pronoun. What do I tell people by using a plural pronoun and do I want people to know that, or wonder about it, or have reason to question.
When I say “I”, generally I mean myself. Adult me, here and now. And while this maybe the case, there is a little niggle at the back of my mind, that sometimes it is not what I mean. It is she, or they, or we. In some ways, the issue is not that complicated, I have all the pronouns needed to describe the different situations. If it’s here and now adult me, it’s “I/me”. If it is one of the others, it is “she/her”, as they all identify as girls. If it is more than one of them at the same time, it is “they/them”. And if it is me plus any combination of the others, it is “we/us”. But, so often this feels so complicated. I might need to distinguish who is thinking or feeling what and to express it, and I might have the pronouns to cover the different possibilities or who might be talking, but there is always something missing from this. There is always something that these words don’t somehow cover and that I wish gave me more. That I wish there were an easier way to express myself, that takes in everybody, but without having to explain who I might mean.
I also struggle with the idea of using a pronoun that goes against the norm. That, by using a third person pronoun or a plural pronoun when talking about myself, gives away something of who I see as me that I don’t know I want to share with everyone. And yet, by not using them, I am forever hiding a part of me, like it always has to be hidden, and in some ways I find that it does. I have spent a long time ashamed of the way my mind works. I understand it, I understand that in many ways my brain did an amazing, fantastic thing to help me survive, but it also eats away at me. And I’m not sure I want the world to know that part of me.
And then, well, then we have what do I hold as the therapist in the room. And it’s interesting, because so often I would say at the moment I am sat across from another person is the moment that I can confidently say that I am singular. It’s not that the others aren’t there, I guess they are never completely gone. But they know, at those moments of the week, that I need to be here and now adult. So then, even if I did start to think about using more of those other pronouns, that all gets shut away again at the point of needing to sit across from a client. And I question my responsibility in this. Do I hold responsibility of not just sticking to the norm, to model that it is ok and not something to be scared of, but something to embrace? I don’t currently have the answers to that. While in general I can see my own argument in that, again, sat across from another person I wonder how much it would complicate their experience.
So again, I wonder, whether it would be easier if there was just one word, which covers all meanings, but would usually be worked out in the context. Then, I might have to explain the context if I wanted to, but I could also leave it ambiguous at other times, and not need to have to explain. And people could take the “normal” meaning, but that wouldn’t have to be what I meant, and I could be honest with myself, without having to also declare it to the world.